Hunkabutta Archives
07.23.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

There has been a lot of talk lately in Tokyo blogging circles about mobile blogging, i.e., posting pictures and text to the Internet using your mobile camera-phone. This has become known as 'moblogging'.

It's become so popular that there was even a local conference held on the subject while I was away in Canada.

Some people think that it's going to revolutionize online publishing and blogging in general, while others seem to feel that it's just going to produce more crap for us to wade through online.

Well, whatever happens with moblogging and camera-phones in the long run, I think that people will be constantly finding new and surprising uses for the technology.

Comments?
6 comments so far

07.20.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

I had a funny thought the other day, and I can't seem to get it out of my head, so, I thought I'd share it with you. It's kind of a hypothetical question, inspired, initially, by musing on the relationship between 'image' and 'reality'.

Here it goes: Lets say a man were to make a pair of tight-fitting shorts out of flesh-coloured rubber that were identical to his own groin area (i.e., penis, pubic hair, the whole bit). Also lets say that these shorts were totally indistinguishable from the real thing, so that when he wore them he looked naked. My question is, if he were to wear these shorts in public could he/should he be charged with indecent exposure?

Technically, he is clothed, but he would seem to be violating the spirit of the law.

Are people offended by nudity, or just the image of nudity? Is there a difference?

What do you think?

Comments?
25 comments so far

07.17.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

You may not know this, but the service on board Air Canada planes is infamous. They're sloppy, inattentive, and occasionally just plain mean. Maybe it's because they have a domestic monopoly, but whatever the reason, it's really starting to get out of hand.

I've noticed that there's a certain consistency in the makeup of the flight staff. Pretty much every Air Canada plane that I've ever been on has had the following crew: One pinched-faced, Margaret-Thatcher-like head flight attendant in her early fifties; one gay steward in his late thirties or early forties; one beautiful, young, novice flight attendant in her twenties; and four or five overworked and dour-faced women in their mid-forties.

On my way back to Japan a few days ago I got stuck with another classic Air Canada crew. They had a particularly nasty head flight attendant by the name of Betty. Although in her early fifties, she kept her hair long and wore it up in a tight little bun. Her glasses, which had a thin gold neck chain on them, sat low on her nose, and she would tilt her head down and peer over the top of them as she spoke to you in a condescending voice.

I sat in an aisle seat. As the plane was making its way down the runway prior to takeoff, they showed the safety feature movie, and all of the flight attendants took their preassigned places in the aisle. One of the dour-faced stewardesses, I think her name was Margaret, stood beside me.

Betty seemed to have it out for Margaret. She stood right behind her, almost touching, with her glasses perched on the end of her nose, whispering criticisms in Margaret's ear. Margaret stood there, her back to Betty, looking straight ahead with a clenched jaw and fists at her side, trying to remain calm. At one point, Betty was giving her shit for not having her jacket on. Margaret said, through clenched teeth, "It's way at the back of the plane."

Betty started to harp on something else for a moment, but then returned to the Jacket issue. "I'll take your place, you go get it," she said, and stood there looking official while Margaret begrudgingly went to get the jacket.

When she returned, Margaret had the jacket on and immediately resumed her place with her back to Betty. Betty, in wide-eyed mock defense, leaned toward Margaret and said, "They're not MY regulations. I didn't write the rules." Then she smugly walked away and took a position a bit further down plane, just out of ear shot.

At this point I looked up at Margaret and said, "Wow, pretty strict, eh?" Margaret looked down at me, and with slow, articulate mouth movements said, "She's a fucking bitch."

"What?!?", I burst out laughing. "You can't say that kind of thing to me! That's too funny!"

With anger still in her face she said, "And I'm not the only one on this crew who thinks so."

It turned out to be a long flight, for both me and Margaret. So now you know.

Comments?
27 comments so far

07.11.03

click to enlarge      
click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

click to see full version

--------------------
Addition: July 13

The following post was actually put online a few days ago, but my site host had some technical problems and lost it. They then put up an older cached version of Hunkabutta. So here it is again. Sorry for the delay. I just got off the plane and am now back home in Tokyo.

More Japan pics soon.

----------------------


It's 1:00 a.m. and I'm sitting here in my father-in-law's small living room, surrounded by countless collectibles and knickknacks, putting together Hunkabutta and thinking about my vacation, which is rapidly coming to an end. I'll be going back to Japan on Sunday.

It's been good here, I love B.C. and I really needed the rest, but I'll be glad to get back to the big sushi, Tokyo.

Somehow, on family vacations, you never seem to get as much time to relax as you expect. There's always one more auntie to visit, one more birthday party to go to, or one more dinner with the grandparents. But hey, that's all fine, getting to know the in-laws and hanging out with the parents are enjoyable past-times. It's just that before I go on vacation I always have these naive leisure fantasies.

I envision myself doing things like walking for hours on the beach alone, or spending entire afternoons drinking coffee and reading novels in sunny outdoor cafes, or learning 20 new songs on the guitar. In reality, Karen and I are too busy rushing from place to place, social function to social function, to stop and do anything more time consuming than to change a dirty diaper.

Anyhow, it's time to turn the light off in the living room and head to bed. It's probably going to be a busy last two days.

Comments?
11 comments so far